Democracy, Market Liberalization and Political Preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper questions the conventional wisdom concerning the sequencing of political and economic reforms in developing countries. We exploit the specific situation of frontier-zones as well as the considerable regional variations in culture and economic development in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in order to estimate the impact of market development and democratization on subjective political preferences. Taking advantage of a new survey conducted in 2006 by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank in 28 post-transition countries, we find a positive and significant effect of democracy on support for a market economy, but no effect of the impact of market liberalization on support for democracy. Our results are robust to the use of various indices of market liberalization and democracy and alternative measures of political preferences. Hence, the relativist argument according to which the demand for democracy is an endogenous by-product of market development is not supported by our data.
منابع مشابه
Should Market Liberalization precede Democracy? Causal Relations between Political Preferences and Development
Should Market Liberalization Precede Democracy? Causal Relations between Political Preferences and Development * This paper is dedicated to the relation between market development and democracy. We distinguish contexts and preferences and ask whether it is true that the demand for democracy only emerges after a certain degree of market development is reached, and whether, conversely, democratiz...
متن کاملN ° 2007 - 17 Should market liberalization precede democracy ? Causal relations between political preferences and development
This paper is dedicated to the relation between market development and democracy. We distinguish contexts and preferences and ask whether it is true that the demand for democracy only emerges after a certain degree of market development is reached, and whether, conversely, democratization is likely to be an obstacle to the acceptation of market liberalization. Our study hinges on a new survey r...
متن کاملDemocracy and Industry-varying Liberalization: Evidence from a New Tariff-line Dataset∗
Do democracies face more or less political pressures to protect certain industries than nondemocracies? How important are a trading partner’s political institutions in overcoming timeinconsistency problems? While domestic political institutions and distributional conflicts across disparate industries have long been central to theories of international political economy, few empirical studies ex...
متن کاملEconomic reform, democracy and growth during post-communist transition
The post-communist transition was associated with two specific phenomena. First, political liberalization was initiated simultaneously with economic reforms. Second, instead of a short Jshaped adjustment, most transition countries experienced deep and protracted recessions. Some analysts suggest that the early introduction of democracy was in fact harmful for economic growth. Similarly, propone...
متن کاملShould market liberalisation precede democracy? Causal relations between political preferences and development
This paper is dedicated to the relationship between market development and democracy. We distinguish between contexts and preferences and ask whether it is true that the demand for democracy only emerges after a certain degree of market development is reached, and whether, conversely, democratisation is likely to be an obstacle to the acceptance of market liberalisation. Our study hinges on a n...
متن کامل